Re: function_graph selftest fails with !DYNAMIC

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 22:25 +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:44:29AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 20:32 +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > > The function_graph selftest fails when CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE is not set
> > > (tested on x86-64) on current kernels:
> > > 
> > > [    0.300124] Testing tracer function: PASSED
> > > [    0.446092] Testing tracer function_graph: .. no entries found ..FAILED!
> > > 
> > > Bisecting goes back to this commit:
> > > 
> > > 2b499381bc50ede01b3d8eab164ca2fad00655f0 is the first bad commit
> > 
> > Your bisect is wrong. I ran it though ktest.pl and it gave me this
> > bisect commit:
> 
> Odd.  2b499381bc50ede really doesn't work for me.  2b499381bc50ede^
> does, so the bisect to 2b499381bc50ede seems correct for my config.
> 
> It appears I'm seeing a different problem, because ...

Hmm, strange, I'll take a look at this on Monday. Thanks.

-- Steve

> 
> > The simple fix is:
> > 
> > --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > @@ -151,7 +151,6 @@ void clear_ftrace_function(void)
> >         ftrace_pid_function = ftrace_stub;
> >  }
> >  
> > -#undef CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACE_MCOUNT_TEST
> >  #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACE_MCOUNT_TEST
> >  /*
> >   * For those archs that do not test ftrace_trace_stop in their
> 
> ... this doesn't seem to fix it.  I've test 3.2-rc1 with this patch
> applied, and the self-test failure is still seen.
> 
> Maybe there's some difference between our configs?  I've attached mine.
> I run it with the "native linux KVM tool".


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/