Re: [PATCH] Fix comparison using wrong pointer variable in dma debugcode

From: Neil Horman
Date: Thu Nov 17 2011 - 15:04:06 EST


On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:31:02PM +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> cppcheck reported:
> [lib/dma-debug.c:248] -> [lib/dma-debug.c:248]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '=='.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/dma-debug.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/dma-debug.c b/lib/dma-debug.c
> index 74c6c7f..fea790a 100644
> --- a/lib/dma-debug.c
> +++ b/lib/dma-debug.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void put_hash_bucket(struct hash_bucket *bucket,
>
> static bool exact_match(struct dma_debug_entry *a, struct dma_debug_entry *b)
> {
> - return ((a->dev_addr == a->dev_addr) &&
> + return ((a->dev_addr == b->dev_addr) &&
> (a->dev == b->dev)) ? true : false;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.6.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Thanks for the catch! Viro just pointed out you can also remove the ?
true/false changes and extraneous parens, reducing it to:

(a->dev_addr == b->dev_addr) && (a->dev == b->dev)
But its not strictly necessecary

Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/