Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysctl-include-fix.patch

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Nov 21 2011 - 11:06:25 EST


On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 13:50 +0100, John Kacur wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cherry-picked for v3.0-rt and fixed minor merge conflict
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/sysctl.h | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Why is this needed? Did something break without it?

And if so, what?

-- Steve

>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sysctl.h
> index 11684d9..92b99dd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sysctl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sysctl.h
> @@ -931,6 +931,7 @@ enum
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
>
> /* For the /proc/sys support */
> struct ctl_table;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/