Re: [PATCH RFC] perf, core: disable pmu while context rotation onlyif needed

[Gleb Natapov]

Hi Peter,

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 01:55:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:38 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 13:34 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Currently pmu is disabled and re-enabled on each timer interrupt even
> > > > when no rotation or frequency adjustment is needed. On Intel CPU this
> > > > results in two writes into PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL MSR per tick. On bare metal
> > > > it does not cause significant slowdown, but when running perf in a virtual
> > > > machine it leads to 20% slowdown on my machine.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I detest asymmetric locking like that, does something like the below
> > > also work for you?
> > > 
> > It does.
> 
> ok, great.
> 
> > >  
> > > +	if (!rotate && !freq)
> > > +		goto done;
> > > +
> > >  	perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
> > >  	perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
> > > +
> > > +	if (!freq)
> > > +		goto rotate;
> > > +
> > Why goto, why not
> > 
> > 	if (freq) {
> > >  	perf_ctx_adjust_freq(&cpuctx->ctx, interval);
> > >  	if (ctx)
> > >  		perf_ctx_adjust_freq(ctx, interval);
> >         }
> > 
> > And the same with next goto.
> 
> Because, uhm,. dunno. Let me make that if()s and commit the thing.
> Thanks!
Have you committed it somewhere? I do not see it in tip.git, but may be
I am looking in a wrong place.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/