[PATCH] percpu: add comment to per_cpu_ptr_to_phys

From: Dave Young
Date: Wed Nov 23 2011 - 03:44:04 EST


add comments about current per_cpu_ptr_to_phys implementation
to explain why the logic is more complicated than necessary.

Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/percpu.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/percpu.c 2011-11-22 10:18:46.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6/mm/percpu.c 2011-11-23 16:27:01.667562973 +0800
@@ -988,6 +988,19 @@ phys_addr_t per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(void *ad
unsigned int cpu;

/*
+ * percpu allocator has special setup for the first chunk,
+ * which currently supports either embedding in linear address space
+ * or vmalloc mapping, and, from the second one, the backing
+ * allocator (currently either vm or km) provides translation.
+ *
+ * The addr can be tranlated simply without checking if it falls
+ * into the first chunk. But the current code reflects better
+ * how percpu allocator actually works, and the verification can
+ * discover both bugs in percpu allocator itself and
+ * per_cpu_ptr_to_phys() callers. So we keep current code.
+ */
+
+ /*
* The following test on first_start/end isn't strictly
* necessary but will speed up lookups of addresses which
* aren't in the first chunk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/