[PATCH] genirq: fix second 2.6.39 regression in irqfixup, irqpoll

From: Edward Donovan
Date: Sun Nov 27 2011 - 23:07:37 EST


commit fa27271bc8d2("genirq: Fixup poll handling") introduced a
regression that broke irqfixup/irqpoll for some hardware
configurations. Amidst reorganizing 'try_one_irq', that patch removed
a test that checked for 'action->handler' returning IRQ_HANDLED,
before acting on the interrupt. Restoring this test back returns the
functionality lost since 2.6.39. In the current set of tests, after
'action' is set, it must precede '!action->next' to take effect.

With this and my previous patch to irq/spurious.c, c75d720fca8a, all
IRQ regressions that I have encountered are fixed.

Signed-off-by: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/irq/spurious.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index b5f4742..dc813a9 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, bool force)
*/
action = desc->action;
if (!action || !(action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) ||
- (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) || !action->next)
+ (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) ||
+ (action->handler(irq, action->dev_id) == IRQ_HANDLED) ||
+ !action->next)
goto out;

/* Already running on another processor */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/