Re: [PATCH 10/62] ata: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()

[Cong Wang]

ä 2011å11æ28æ 19:42, Cong Wang åé:
> ä 2011å11æ28æ 18:01, Sergei Shtylyov åé:
> > Hello.
> >
> > On 27-11-2011 9:26, Cong Wang wrote:
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang<amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 8 ++++----
> > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > IMO, you should do this in a single patch, not piecemeal to keep the kernel bisectable.
>
> Hi,
>
> Please see patch 01/62,
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/35
>
> So even without it, the kernel can still compile, just with some warnings.

Ah, no, sorry that I replied too quickly. We have to have at least 01/62
to compile.

Actually I did make the patches as a whole, but Andrew Morton prefers to
split them, so I make V2 of them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/