Re: [patch 3/6] sched, nohz: sched group, domain aware nohz idleload balancing

[Suresh Siddha]

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 01:44 -0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 15:51 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > Current mainline code kicks the idle load balancer if there are two busy
> > cpus in the system. Above mentioned modification makes this decision
> > some what better. For example, two busy cpu's in two different sockets
> > or two busy cpu's in a dual-core single socket system will never kick
> > idle load balancer (as there is no need).
> 
> Except in power balance mode (although that's probably busted anyway),

It is already busted, no doubt about that.

> where we want to aggregate the two tasks over two sockets onto one
> socket.

So was there any discussion regarding restoring the power savings mode
at the recent scheduler bof? Even in the latest platforms, there is a
small power savings when we consolidate the two tasks in two sockets
onto one socket (though the power difference is shrinking). Turbo
headroom also plays some role in this. Two tasks in two sockets
potentially have more turbo headroom compared to the two tasks in one
socket and thus increased performance with increased power.

thanks,
suresh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/