Re: [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support

[Hans Rosenfeld]

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:01:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 12:36 PM, Hans Rosenfeld wrote:
> > 
> > So I assume, if you have 10000s of processes on a legacy 32bit system
> > that never do any FPU stuff or SSE optimizations, you might indeed waste
> > a couple of megabytes. I don't think thats very realistic, but that's
> > just my opinion.
> > 
> 
> A couple of megabytes of *lowmem*...

Ok, I'll rework that part, so that preallocation only happens on systems
that support non-lazy states. That means patch #7 is going away and
patch #8 is getting slightly bigger. This may take a few days as I have
to test that again.

Meanwhile, could you please take a look at patches #1 to #6?


Hans


-- 
%SYSTEM-F-ANARCHISM, The operating system has been overthrown

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/