Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Fri Dec 02 2011 - 17:41:06 EST


On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Anton Vorontsov
<anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> One option is to test this patch on a board that is now broken:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/10/290

That seems broken.

Spot the trouble:

+ ret = irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier,
+ oirq.size);
+no_irq:
+#ifdef NO_IRQ
+#if NO_IRQ != 0
+ if (ret == NO_IRQ)
+ pr_warn("Hit NO_IRQ case for your arch. Drivers might expect "
+ "NO_IRQ, but we return 0. If anything breaks, driver "
+ "have to be fixed.\n");
+#endif
+#endif
+ return ret;

It claims "we return 0", but then doesn't return zero.. Hmm?

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/