Re: [stable] 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes?

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:25:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:44:30PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > The softlockup false positive issue should have been fixed by Peter's
> > "x86, intel: Don't mark sched_clock() as stable" below. But I'm not
> > seeing it upstream.  Peter, is this still the right fix?
> 
> I've not seen any other one proposed, and both you and Peter appeared
> to like it. I understood that Ingo was waiting for the merge window to
> submit it and I think that it simply got lost.
> 
> Ingo, can you confirm ?

I'm totally confused here, what's the status of this, and what exactly
is the patch?

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/