Re: [PATCH] backlight: add regulator support for platform_lcd driver

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 04:06:17PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 5 December 2011 15:40, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Recent regulator discussion. it should be failed instead fall through
> > gracefully.

> Ok. But in this case, there could be boards that do not use a
> regulator for the lcd/display interface. Is it mandatory for fail if
> regulator is not found. Sorry, I have not read through the regulator
> discussion.

The boards should supply a fixed voltage regulator representing the
supply (or use CONFIG_REGULATOR_DUMMY to substitute in a dummy regulator
when not needed).  Sascha Hauer had some patches to add a flag that
could be set to enable this mode on init rather than through Kconfig but
they needed a bit of cleanup, not sure what the status is there.

> The constraint 'apply_uV' cannot be expressed with a device tree. So
> there has be a mechanism to set the required output voltage for a
> regulator.

It's not an option to not have it with device tree - if there's a single
voltage specified apply_uV is assumed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/