Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86: Add NumaChip support

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Dec 06 2011 - 00:52:09 EST



* Steffen Persvold <sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 12/5/2011 21:31, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> []
> > There's a new build failure caused by this commit:
>
> It's this commit actually :
>
> Commit-ID: 64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda
> Author: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:20:37 +0800
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:17:21 +0100
>
> x86: Add x86_init platform override to fix up NUMA core numbering
>
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1149:2: error: âstruct cpuinfo_x86â has no member named âphys_proc_idâ
> >
> > Note that the config is a !SMP one - that's probably the key
> > detail.
>
> Yes, phys_proc_id in struct cpuinfo_x86 is covered within "ifdef CONFIG_SMP".
>
> >
> > Please send a delta fix that resolves this bug. You can find the
> > current lineup in:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
> >
>
> Will do, should be fairly simple. Something in the lines of the attached should work (tested).
>
> Note: I used "ifdef CONFIG_NUMA" simply because it doesn't make sense in a non-numa configuration even with SMP enabled. Besides, the only place where it is called right now is in kernel/cpu/amd.c:srat_detect_node() within the "CONFIG_NUMA" protected part.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Steffen Persvold, Chief Architect NumaChip
> Numascale AS - www.numascale.com
> Tel: +47 92 49 25 54 Skype: spersvold

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index ad4da45..a70bd5b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -1146,7 +1146,9 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void)
> */
> void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> pr_err("NUMA core number %d differs from configured core number %d\n", node, c->phys_proc_id);
> +#endif
> }

Yep, this should do the trick - i'll need a Signed-off-by line
to apply it.

Ideally i think c->phys_proc_id should should be available
regardless of CONFIG_SMP or CONFIG_NUMA considerations - but
that would be a wider change. (feel free to have a shot at it
though, in addition to the fix above)

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/