[032/104] genirq: fix regression in irqfixup, irqpoll

[Greg KH]

3.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 52553ddffad76ccf192d4dd9ce88d5818f57f62a upstream.

Commit fa27271bc8d2("genirq: Fixup poll handling") introduced a
regression that broke irqfixup/irqpoll for some hardware configurations.

Amidst reorganizing 'try_one_irq', that patch removed a test that
checked for 'action->handler' returning IRQ_HANDLED, before acting on
the interrupt.  Restoring this test back returns the functionality lost
since 2.6.39.  In the current set of tests, after 'action' is set, it
must precede '!action->next' to take effect.

With this and my previous patch to irq/spurious.c, c75d720fca8a, all
IRQ regressions that I have encountered are fixed.

Signed-off-by: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-and-tested-by: Rogério Brito <rbrito@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 kernel/irq/spurious.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct i
 	 */
 	action = desc->action;
 	if (!action || !(action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) ||
-	    (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) || !action->next)
+	    (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) ||
+	    (action->handler(irq, action->dev_id) == IRQ_HANDLED) ||
+	    !action->next)
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Already running on another processor */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/