Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver becauseof worrying about possible misusage?

[Andreas Oberritter]

On 07.12.2011 17:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> You're talking about a purely software defined thing that goes in the
> kernel - it pretty much has to be able to scale to other applications
> even if some of the implementation is left for later.  Once things like
> this get included in the kernel they become part of the ABI and having
> multiple specific things ends up being a recipie for confusion as users
> have to work out which of the options is most appropriate for their
> application.

And to repeat myself once more: No networking is to be perfomed by the
kernel in vtunerc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/