Re: [PATCH] unifdef: drop unused errno.h include

From: Tony Finch
Date: Mon Dec 12 2011 - 06:06:54 EST


On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 05:26:50PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> This is the only header on my system that ends up requiring kernel
> headers, so if the kernel headers aren't available, we end up being
> unable to install kernel headers :).

I have some sympathy for this problem but I tend to think that it's
unreasonable to expect unifdef to work with an incomplete compiler
installation.

> Since this file doesn't actually use anything from errno.h, drop
> the include so it at least makes us a bit more robust on glibc.

The Linux kernel currently has unifdef-2.5. Version 2.6 has better error
handling so it uses the declaration of errno but not any of the E*
values. I could perhaps rejig it to avoid this if it really is important
to be able to bootsrap a system with incomplete headers.

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/
Lundy, Fastnet, Irish Sea: West, backing south for a time, 5 or 6, increasing
7 to severe gale 9. Moderate or rough, occasionally very rough or high. Rain
or squally wintry showers. Good, occasionally poor.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/