Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/8] ACPI: add processor driver for Xen virtualCPUs.

[liang tang]

On 2011-12-13 15:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 12.12.11 at 18:29, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:24:23AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 30.11.11 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> > > > @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_METHOD)+= custom_method.o
> > > >   # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace
> > > >   processor-y			:= processor_driver.o processor_throttling.o
> > > >   processor-y			+= processor_idle.o processor_thermal.o
> > > > +processor-y			+= processor_xen.o
> > > This should minimally be processor-$(CONFIG_XEN), with other things
> > > adjusted as necessary.
> > I was under the impression that this was required to get the
> > processor_xen.ko
> > to be a module. Otherwise it would only compile as built-in.
> processor_xen.ko? Why not have all the code go into processor.ko?
> (And the original construct didn't aim in that direction either.)
>
> Jan
the code about driver function which kernel 
require(drivers/acpi/processor_xen.c )  build into processor.ko.
the code which have more relation with xen 
(drivers/xen/acpi_processor.c)  did not build into processor.ko.
liang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/