Re: [PATCH] Fix for binary_sysctl() memory leak

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Dec 15 2011 - 17:19:48 EST


On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:44:12 -0800
Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> binary_sysctl() calls sysctl_getname() which allocates from
> names_cache slab usin __getname()
>
> The matching function to free the name is __putname(), and not
> putname() which should be used only to match getname() allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c b/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> index e8bffbe..2ce1b30 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> @@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ static ssize_t binary_sysctl(const int *name, int nlen,
>
> fput(file);
> out_putname:
> - putname(pathname);
> + __putname(pathname);
> out:
> return result;
> }

I think the patch is correct but the description is misleading?

I see no memory leak here. Calling __putname() directly simply
bypasses some audit-related stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/