Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree

[Grant Likely]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Ashish Jangam
<Ashish.Jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: glikely@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:glikely@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Grant Likely
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:55 PM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell; linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mark Brown; Dajun
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Ashish Jangam
> <ashish.jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Fixes DA9052 GPIO errors.
>>
>> This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen <dchen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c      |   37 ++++--------------------------
>>  include/linux/mfd/da9052/gpio.h |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> gpio-da9052.c is the only users of mfd/da9052/gpio.h.  Why is this
> include file needed?  The #defines can simply stay in the .c file.
> I've picked up the patch, but modified it to keep the header defines
> in the .c file.  If there is a reason this won't work, then please let
> me know.
>
> This header file is shared between GPIO and LED module. I have already
> posted this LED long back got ACK but did not got merged due to its
> dependency on MFD module.

Are the LEDs attached to GPIOs?  If so, then is there a reason that
the leds-gpio driver can't be used?

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/