Re: [PATCH] loop: fput() called in loop_clr_fd() may cause bd_mutexrecursive locking

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (12/17/11 22:58), Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:37:45AM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > Think of it for a minute - if we could run into the
> > > same bdev in that recursion, what would have happened on read() from
> > > that sucker? So yes, it is a false positive. 
> > 
> > I've tried read()/write() some time ago and it worked. Perhaps, I just
> > wasn't "lucky" enough to hit any problems.
> 
> Sure - exactly because of that loop prevention logics.  *If* we really
> had been able to set a loop0 -> loop1 -> loop2 -> loop0 or something of
> that sort, this warning wouldn't be a false positive.  But on any
> such setup, where would IO attempts end up doing?  

Thanks for your explanations.

> IOW, we have to prevent such setups anyway and not just because of
> problems on close() - they would be deadly on read() and write()...
> 

Preventing recursion in the first place? For example, in lo_open()?


	Sergey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/