Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: musb: fix pm_runtime mismatches

[Felipe Contreras]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> > Should these calls be pm_runtime_put_sync() instead of
>> > pm_runtime_put()?
>>
>> I don't see why... The thing failed, it's not going to be used any
>> more so better let PM deactivate the device.
>
> It's not a big deal. ÂThe difference is that pm_runtime_put_sync()
> avoids an extra context switch when suspending the device. ÂA minor
> optimization, that's all.

Ok, I used what most of the code was using, but I've trusted you and
updated the patches. It would probably make sense to do the same in
other places.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/