Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] sound/soc/lapis: add platform driver for ML7213IOH I2S

[Tomoya MORINAGA]

2011/12/20 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:45:44AM +0900, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
>
>> +static int ignore_overrun = 1;
>> +module_param(ignore_overrun, int, 0444);
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_overrun, "ignore RX overruns (default=0)");
>
> This shouldn't be a driver specific thing, and if we were to have such a
> feature a module parameter doesn't seem like a great way of doing it.

I'll delete this parameter.

>
>> +/*****************************************************************************
>> + *   I2S HAL (Hardware Abstruction Layer)
>> + *****************************************************************************/
>
> Please follow the kernel coding style in terms of comments.
I' ll modify this.

>
>> +static void ioh_i2s_enable_interrupts(int ch, enum dma_data_direction dir)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned int intr_lines;
>> +
>> +     if (dir)
>> +             intr_lines = 1 << (I2S_IMASK_RX_BIT_START + ch);
>> +
>> +     else
>> +             intr_lines = 1 << (I2S_IMASK_TX_BIT_START + ch);
>
> I'd expect a switch statement corresponding to the enum, not an if
> statement.
"if" will replace "switch".

>
>> +static void ioh_i2s_disable_interrupts(int ch, enum dma_data_direction dir)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned int intr_lines;
>> +
>> +     /*intr_lines&=I2S_ALL_INTERRUPT_BITS; */
>> +     intr_lines = ioread32(i2s_data->iobase + I2SIMASK_OFFSET);
>
> What's this commented out code for?  Also as a coding style thing
> you should have a space between /* and the text in the comment (this
> applies throughout the driver).
I'll delete.

>
>> +     /*disable interrupts for specified channel */
>> +     if (dir)
>> +             intr_lines |= 1 << (I2S_IMASK_RX_BIT_START + ch);
>> +     else
>> +             intr_lines |= 1 << (I2S_IMASK_TX_BIT_START + ch);
>> +
>> +     /*Mask the specific interrupt bits */
>> +     iowrite32(intr_lines, i2s_data->iobase + I2SIMASK_OFFSET);
>
> What ensures that this read/modify/write cycle can't race with another
> caller?
I'll add exclusive processing like spin-lock.

>
>> +/* Clear interrupt status */
>> +static void ioh_i2s_clear_tx_sts_ir(int ch)
>> +{
>> +     int offset = ch * 0x800;
>> +
>> +     iowrite32(I2S_TX_FINT | I2S_TX_AFINT | I2S_TX_EINT | I2S_TX_AEINT,
>> +             i2s_data->iobase + I2SISTTX_OFFSET + offset);
>> +}
>
> This appears to unconditionally acknowledge all interrupts, generally
> you should only acknowledge interrupts that have been handled.
> Otherwise it's possible that interrupts may be dropped if they're
> flagged between the status read and acknowledgement write.

I can understand your saying.
If following your saying, only called by i2s_dma_tx_complete is enough.

However I think adding clearing interrupt status at both before and
after i2s communicating start/finish is better.


>
>> +/*****************************************************************************
>> + *   I2S Middle ware
>> + *****************************************************************************/
>
> I'm really not convinced of the value of these layers, reading the code
> it really feels incredibly verbose in comparison with what I'd expect
> from such a driver and I can't help that think that a lot of this
> verbosity is down to muddling through these abstraction layers.
>
>> +static bool filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *slave)
>
> This needs a better name.  It's not namespaced and it's not clear what
> it's filtering.

In case of using Linux standard DMA API, function "filter" is the most
popular name.
Almost drivers which use standard use "filter".


>
>> +static struct dma_chan *ioh_request_dma_channel(
>> +                int ch, struct ioh_i2s_dma *dma, enum dma_data_direction dir)
>> +{
>> +     dma_cap_mask_t mask;
>> +     struct dma_chan *chan;
>> +     struct pci_dev *dma_dev;
>> +     dma_cap_zero(mask);
>> +     dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
>> +
>> +     dma_dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(2, PCI_DEVFN(0, 1)); /* Get DMA's dev
>> +                                                             information */
>> +
>> +     if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) { /* Rx */
>
> switch statement to select between multiple options in the enum.  This
> applies throughout the code.
"if" will replace "switch".

>
>> +static void
>> +ioh_i2s_write(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, const void *data, int len)
>> +{
>> +     int rem1;
>> +     int rem2;
>
> What is this supposed to do?  There's an awful lot of it, and it looks
> like it's supposed to be rewriting the data format for some reason which
> isn't something that a driver ought to be doing (apart from anything
> else it does rather defeat the point of DMA).

This driver has buffer which is for preventing noisy sound  by jitter
So, this buffer is variable.

>
>> +static void ioh_i2s_configure_i2s_regs(int ch, enum ioh_direction dir)
>> +{
>> +     int offset = ch * 0x800;
>
> You should have a function to map the channel into a number.
understand.

>
>> +
>> +     if (dir) {
>> +             /* Rx register */
>> +             iowrite32(I2S_AFULL_THRESH / 2,
>> +                       i2s_data->iobase + I2SAFRX_OFFSET + offset);
>> +             iowrite32(0x1F, i2s_data->iobase + I2SAERX_OFFSET + offset);
>> +             iowrite32(0x1F, i2s_data->iobase + I2SMSKRX_OFFSET + offset);
>> +             iowrite32(0xC, i2s_data->iobase + I2SISTRX_OFFSET + offset);
>
> Lots of magic numbers here and given that the function is called just
> "configure" it's not clear what the intended purpose is.  This needs to
> be clarified.
understand.

>
>> +             /* Rx configuration */
>> +             if (atomic_read(&dma->rx_busy)) {
>> +                     dev_err(i2s_data->dev, "rx i2s%dalready opened\n", ch);
>
> ...
>
>> +     } else {
>> +             /* Tx configuration */
>> +             if (atomic_read(&dma->tx_busy)) {
>
> There's a *lot* of duplicate code in the driver for TX and RX, it should
> be possible to abstract out much more common code.
I'll study.

>
>> +static void i2s_tx_almost_empty_ir(int ch)
>> +{
>> +     struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc;
>> +     int num;
>> +     int tx_comp_index;
>> +     struct ioh_i2s_dma *dma = &dmadata[ch];
>> +     struct scatterlist *sg = dma->sg_tx_p;
>> +     void *cb_ch;
>> +
>> +     dev_dbg(i2s_data->dev, "%s: data_head=%p data_complete=%p\n", __func__,
>> +             dma->tx_data_head, dma->tx_complete);
>> +
>> +     num = ((int)dma->tx_avail) / (I2S_AEMPTY_THRESH * 4);
>
> That case looks *very* suspect.
This is correct.
Why do you think so ?

>
>> +     tx_comp_index = (((int)(dma->tx_complete - dma->tx_head))) /\
>> +                     (I2S_AEMPTY_THRESH * 4);
>
> There is very rarely any need for line continuations outside of macros.
>
>> +static inline void ioh_i2s_interrupt_sub_tx(int ch)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned int status;
>> +     int offset = ch * 0x800;
>> +
>> +     status = ioread32(i2s_data->iobase + I2SISTTX_OFFSET + offset);
>> +     if (status & I2S_TX_EINT)
>> +             i2s_tx_empty_ir(ch);
>> +     if (status & I2S_TX_AEINT)
>> +             i2s_tx_almost_empty_ir(ch);
>
> Given that all you're doing is logging just open code the log message.
Understand.

>
>> +     default:
>> +             return -1;
>
> Return error codes, you EPERM almost certainly isn't the error you meant
> to report.
I'll modify.

>
>> +static int ioh_i2s_pci_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
>> +{
>> +     int ret;
>> +
>> +     ioh_i2s_save_reg_conf(pdev);
>
> You should be doing this in ASoC suspend/resume callbacks, not in PCI
> ones.
Understand.


thanks,
tomoya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/