Re: [PATCH] mm: mmap system call does not return EOVERFLOW

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Thu Dec 22 2011 - 11:58:38 EST


> To fix this bug, it is necessary to compare "off" plus "len"
> with "off" by units of "off_t". The patch is here:
>
> Signed-off-by: Naotaka Hamaguchi <n.hamaguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/mmap.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index eae90af..e74e736 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -948,6 +948,7 @@ unsigned long do_mmap_pgoff(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>        vm_flags_t vm_flags;
>        int error;
>        unsigned long reqprot = prot;
> +       off_t off = pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
>        /*
>         * Does the application expect PROT_READ to imply PROT_EXEC?
> @@ -971,7 +972,7 @@ unsigned long do_mmap_pgoff(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>                return -ENOMEM;
>
>        /* offset overflow? */
> -       if ((pgoff + (len >> PAGE_SHIFT)) < pgoff)
> +       if ((off + len) < off)
>                return -EOVERFLOW;

Hmm...
pgoff doesn't make actual overflow. do_mmap_pgoff() can calculate big
value. We have
no reason to make artificial limit. Why don't you meke a overflow
check in sys_mmap()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/