Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

From: Semwal, Sumit
Date: Mon Dec 26 2011 - 01:52:16 EST

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rob Clark <rob@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Semwal, Sumit <sumit.semwal@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>>> Hence for both patches:
>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Yeah I'm with Daniel, I like this one, I can definitely build the drm
>>> buffer sharing layer on top of this.
>>> How do we see this getting merged? I'm quite happy to push it to Linus
>>> if we don't have an identified path, though it could go via a Linaro
>>> tree as well.
>>> so feel free to add:
>>> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Thanks Daniel and Dave!
>> I guess we can start with staging for 3.3, and see how it shapes up. I
>> will post the latest patch version pretty soon.
> not sure about staging, but could make sense to mark as experimental.
Thanks, I will mark it experimental for the first version; we can
remove that once it is more widely used and tested.
>> Arnd, Dave: do you have any preference on the path it takes to get
>> merged? In my mind, Linaro tree might make more sense, but I would
>> leave it upto you gentlemen.
> Looks like Dave is making some progress on drm usage of buffer sharing
> between gpu's.. if that is ready to go in at the same time, it might
> be a bit logistically simpler for him to put dmabuf in the same pull
> req.  I don't have strong preference one way or another, so do what is
> collectively simpler ;-)
:) Right - I am quite happy for it to get merged in either ways :)
> BR,
> -R
Best regards,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at