Re: [patch 1/4] Add routine for generating an ID for kernel pointer

From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Wed Dec 28 2011 - 02:24:27 EST

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:48:17PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > Is c/r useless without GENERIC_OBJECT_ID? If so, perhaps a `select'
> > would be good here.
> Is GENERIC_OBJECT_ID useful elsewhere? If so, then it shouldn't depend
> on CHECKPOINT_RESTORE -- it should just live in lib/ instead of in mm/
> and CHECKPOINT_RESTORE should select it.

Well, at moment I simply don't know who else might need it. So I though
that if someone would need it we simply drop CHECKPOINT_RESTORE dep then.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at