Re: [PATCH v6] kvm: make vcpu life cycle separated from kvm instance
From: Takuya Yoshikawa
Date: Wed Dec 28 2011 - 05:18:13 EST
(2011/12/28 18:54), Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/28/2011 11:53 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/27/2011 10:38 AM, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
From: Liu Ping Fan<pingfank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Currently, vcpu can be destructed only when kvm instance destroyed.
Change this to vcpu's destruction before kvm instance, so vcpu MUST
and CAN be destroyed before kvm's destroy.
Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan<pingfank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c | 10 +++--
arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c | 17 +++++--
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 53 +++++++++++-----------
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 20 +++-----
virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 6 ++-
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
Oops, that's only needed when the unplug API is introduced.
I think it is OK to to add such an API later on, but I really want
the author to write the plan in the changelog.
Otherwise people not belonging to Red Hat or IBM cannot know what
this commit is aiming at.
I am not objecting to this patch itself, but the way this kind of change
is being introduced seems not be in a good manner.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/