Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:07:52AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 17:21, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 05:45:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Because of the powerpc problems above, I have used the driver-core tree
> >> from next-20111222 for today.
> >
> > Sorry about all of the problems, we tried to fix everything we could,
> > but your merges and cross-builds found stuff we missed :(
> >
> > Kay, care to send me patches to fix this, and all of the other
> > linux-next-reported problems to me so we can get this resolved this
> > week?
> 
> I rather don't want to add error checking to stuff that doesn't do it
> today. The sysdev stuff never had that forced checks, but the normal
> device stuff has.

That's fine.

> I think the force return value check is really a pretty misguided idea
> in general, and it's up to the caller to do these checks and handle
> rollbacks, not the driver core, I think.
> 
> Can't we just remove that forced check?

Probably, if it fixes these warning-is-an-error problems.  There were
other issues with linux-next that were build issues, not just this one
from what I recall, that kept Stephen from including the tree in
linux-next.  I can bounce them to you if you missed them.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/