Re: KVM guest-kernel panics double fault

[Stephan Bärwolf]

On 01/10/12 13:34, Avi Kivity wrote:
> I prepare/adapt everything to the mentioned styles/policy.
> (I'll insert 2 additional ops for getting "cpuid" and "id of vcpu"...)
>>> What do you mean by "id of vcpu"?
>> I mean the number of the corresponding vcpu.
>> (So mostly "vcpu->vcpu_id" ...)
>> It is necessary for "pr_err_ratelimited"-complains, if cpuid-vendor is
>> unknown ...
>> ("Jan 10 12:14:55 thinkrat kernel: [ 4476.484359] kvm: 15680: cpu0
>> unknown vendor - assuming intel")
> It isn't worthwhile - just don't print the vcpu number (the task ID
> contains enough information, and anyway this should be rare to the point
> of never ever happening)
>

The message itself can be user-triggered ("-cpu
core2duo,vendor=StephansQemu"),
but you are right. Normally all cpus got the same cpuid, so it shouln't
interest
which one had the unknown vendor...

...fixing it and then sending...

regards Stephan

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. Stephan Bärwolf
Ilmenau University of Technology, Integrated Communication Systems Group
Phone: +49 (0)3677 69 4130
Email: stephan.baerwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,  
Web: http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/iks

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/