Re: [Question] sched: Should balance_iterator be removed?

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 22:10 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Commit 4a55bd5e97b1775913 (sched: fair-group: de-couple load-balancing
> from the rb-trees) added balance_iterator in cfs_rq. But, no real use
> in current code. Shouldn't it be removed? Or has it been kept for
> future use?

Nope its dead wood, thanks for spotting it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/