Re: [PATCH 2/5] xt_log: Make printk() in sb_close() optional

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 23:43 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
> 
> 

Missing change log. Note, the subject is not good enough of a
description.

-- Steve

> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/net/netfilter/xt_log.h |    9 ++++++---
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/xt_log.h b/include/net/netfilter/xt_log.h
> index 0dfb34a..767e08d 100644
> --- a/include/net/netfilter/xt_log.h
> +++ b/include/net/netfilter/xt_log.h
> @@ -39,10 +39,12 @@ static struct sbuff *sb_open(void)
>  	return m;
>  }
>  
> -static void sb_close(struct sbuff *m)
> +static void __sb_close(struct sbuff *m, int print)
>  {
> -	m->buf[m->count] = 0;
> -	printk("%s\n", m->buf);
> +	if (print) {
> +		m->buf[m->count] = 0;
> +		printk("%s\n", m->buf);
> +	}
>  
>  	if (likely(m != &emergency))
>  		kfree(m);
> @@ -52,3 +54,4 @@ static void sb_close(struct sbuff *m)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +#define sb_close(m)	__sb_close(m, 1)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/