Re: [PATCH] trace: reset sleep/block start time on task switch

[Arun Sharma]

On 1/24/12 6:27 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Bah, you're right. Also yes your proposal is too intrusive, but that can
> be fixed, I actually did, but then I noticed its broken too, it doesn't
> matter if the schedule that schedules a task back in preempted another
> task or not, what matters is if the task we're scheduling back in was
> itself preempted or recently woken. And we simply don't know.

Yes - we'd need an extra bit in the task_struct to do this right.

> I'm tempted to revert 1ac9bc69 for now, userspace will simply have to
> correlate trace_sched_switch() and trace_sched_stat_{sleep,blocked}(),
> which shouldn't be too hard.

We tried it and it didn't work very well. Especially when used with perf 
record -g. There are too many uninteresting trace_sched_switch() events.

Other possibilites: make a copy of {sleep,block}_start somewhere else in 
the perf_events subsystem in the sleep/wakeup path and leave 
sched_statistics untouched.

 -Arun


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/