Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 24

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Jan 24 2012 - 18:14:46 EST


Hi Stephen,

On Tuesday, January 24, 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20120123:
>
> New tree: ktest
> Reinstated tree: input-mt
>
> My fixes tree contains:
> powerpc: make PSERIES_IDLE bool
>
> Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
>
> The arm tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>
> The arm-soc tree lost its conflicts but gained another against the arm
> tree.
>
> The s5p tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
>
> The nfs tree lost its build failure.
>
> The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure.
>
> The input tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20120123.
>
> The akpm tree lost several patches that were merged into Linus' tree.

Is there any new material touching kernel/workqueue.c or kernel/freezer.c?

We seem to have a freezer regression in linux-next which doesn't seem to be
present in my tree.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/