Re: [patch 1/4] fs, proc: Introduce /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/childrenentry v8

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Jan 24 2012 - 18:53:05 EST


On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:20:37 +0400
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When we do checkpoint of a task we need to know the list of children
> the task, has but there is no easy and fast way to generate reverse
> parent->children chain from arbitrary <pid> (while a parent pid is
> provided in "PPid" field of /proc/<pid>/status).
>
> So instead of walking over all pids in the system (creating one big process
> tree in memory, just to figure out which children a task has) -- we add
> explicit /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children entry, because the kernel already has
> this kind of information but it is not yet exported.
>
> This is a first level children, not the whole process tree.

Is there a reason for not putting this new code inside
CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTART? If so, please changelog that.

We could add

/* #ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTART (reasoning goes here) */

so that if we should decide to pull all this code out again, a grep
will flag this code for consideration.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/