Re: [000/129] 3.2.2-stable review

[Jesper Juhl]

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:47:08PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > > #include <stable/formletter.h>
> > > #define RELEASE		3.2.2-rc1
> > > #define NUM_PATCHES	129
> > > #define RESPONSE_DATE	"Wed, Jan 25, 2012 20:00:00 +0000"
> > > #define LOCATION	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.2.2-rc1.gz
> > 
> > A very small, seriously not at all important, tiny question; Why are the 
> > patches for 3.2.x placed in /pub/linux/kernel/v3.**0**/ ???
> 
> It's a symlink, why not?  :)
> 
Just seems confusing, that's all.. After all, 3.2.x is not 3.0.x, so it 
looks like an error...
Not at all important, that's just the impression I got..

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/