RE: [PATCH v1 3/8] ARM: tegra: rework Tegra secondary CPU corebringup

From: Stephen Warren
Date: Thu Jan 26 2012 - 15:26:50 EST


Peter De Schrijver wrote at Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:07 AM:
> Prepare the Tegra secondary CPU core bringup code for other Tegra variants.
> The reset handler is also generalized to allow for future introduction of
> powersaving modes which turn off the CPU cores.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/headsmp.S

> ENTRY(tegra_secondary_startup)
...
> + enable_coresight r0

> +ENTRY(__tegra_cpu_reset_handler)
> +
> +#if DEBUG_CPU_RESET_HANDLER
> + enable_coresight r0
> + b .
> +#endif

I'm not sure why the macro call enable_coresight is ifdef'd in one place
but not the other... Should just the instruction "b ." be inside the
ifdef?

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c

> +static void tegra_cpu_reset_handler_enable(void)

> + /*
> + * Prevent further modifications to the physical reset vector.
> + * NOTE: Has no effect on chips prior to Tegra30.
> + */
> + reg = readl(sb_ctrl);
> + reg |= 2;
> + writel(reg, sb_ctrl);
> + wmb();

Should we skip that on Tegra20 then?

> +void __init tegra_cpu_reset_handler_init(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long *cpu_reset_data_start, *cpu_reset_data_end;

Those variables are unused.

--
nvpublic

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/