Re: [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 17:26 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/26, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > However I think your proposal:
> >
> > >                 for (;;) {
> > >                         tsk->state = TASK_DEAD;
> > >                         schedule();
> > >                 }
> >
> > should equally work, if we hit the race and call schedule() with ->state
> > = TASK_RUNNING,
> 
> Yes, in this case everything is fine, but we can shedule() with TASK_DEAD
> state. preempt_disable() can't (and shouldn't) prevent deactivate_task().
> 
> To simplify, try_to_wake_up() does
> 
> 		spin_lock(pi_lock);
> 
> 		if (!(p->state & state))
> 			goto out;
> 
> 		/* WINDOW */
> 
> 		if (p->on_rq) {
> 			... everything is fine ...
> 		}
> 
> 		p->state = TASK_WAKING;
> 		ttwu_queue(p, cpu);
> 
> And the exiting task does
> 
> 	// but do not sleep ...
> 	current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
> 							// ttwu() checks ->state
> 	...
> 	tsk->state = TASK_DEAD;
> 	schedule();
> 		-> deactivate_task();
> 		-> tsk->on_rq = 0;
> 		-> finish_task_switch();
> 
> 							// ttwu() checks ->on_rq
> 
> In theory it can do this all in the WINDOW above. In this case we
> can wake it up again, after finish_task_switch()-put_task_struct().
> 
> No?

Yes, bugger. Ok I'll queue Yasunori-san's patch as is.

Thanks everyone!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/