Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 17:47 -0600, Will Drewry wrote:

> > Isn't 'struct seccomp_struct' a bit redundant?
> >
> > How about a simple 'struct seccomp' instead?
> 
> Works for me - I can't recall why that seemed to make sense (other
> than the user of similar redundant names elsewhere).
> 

You mean like... struct task_struct?

;-)

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/