Re: Pinmux bindings proposal V2

[Shawn Guo]

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
...
> I guess the analog we should follow here is clk_get and clk_set_rate,
> except we would have pinconf_set_state with predefined states.
> 
It seems working for cases that we only change pinconf but never pinmux
for different configuration states.  But how would that work for cases
that require mux change for different configuration states?

-- 
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/