Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Sleep: Freeze filesystems during system suspend/hibernation

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Jan 30 2012 - 16:01:58 EST


On Monday, January 30, 2012, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 28-01-12 14:45:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Freeze all filesystems during system suspend and (kernel-driven)
> > hibernation by calling freeze_supers() for all superblocks and thaw
> > them during the subsequent resume with the help of thaw_supers().
> >
> > This makes filesystems stay in a consistent state in case something
> > goes wrong between system suspend (or hibernation) and the subsequent
> > resume (e.g. journal replays won't be necessary in those cases). In
> > particular, this should help to solve a long-standing issue that, in
> > some cases, during resume from hibernation the boot loader causes the
> > journal to be replied for the filesystem containing the kernel image
> > and/or initrd causing it to become inconsistent with the information
> > stored in the hibernation image.
> >
> > The user-space-driven hibernation (s2disk) is not covered by this
> > change, because the freezing of filesystems prevents s2disk from
> > accessing device special files it needs to do its job.
> >
> > This change is based on earlier work by Nigel Cunningham.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/super.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/fs.h | 3 +
> > kernel/power/hibernate.c | 11 +++++--
> > kernel/power/power.h | 23 --------------
> > kernel/power/suspend.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux/fs/super.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/fs/super.c
> > +++ linux/fs/super.c
> > @@ -594,6 +594,79 @@ void iterate_supers_type(struct file_sys
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(iterate_supers_type);
> >
> > /**
> > + * thaw_supers - call thaw_super() for all superblocks
> > + */
> > +void thaw_supers(void)
> > +{
> > + struct super_block *sb, *p = NULL;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&sb_lock);
> > + list_for_each_entry(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) {
> > + if (list_empty(&sb->s_instances))
> > + continue;
> > + sb->s_count++;
> > + spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
> > +
> > + if (sb->s_flags & MS_FROZEN) {
> > + thaw_super(sb);
> > + sb->s_flags &= ~MS_FROZEN;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&sb_lock);
> > + if (p)
> > + __put_super(p);
> > + p = sb;
> > + }
> > + if (p)
> > + __put_super(p);
> > + spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
> > +}
> At least for thawing you can use iterate_supers() helper.

OK

> > +/**
> > + * freeze_supers - call freeze_super() for all superblocks
> > + */
> > +int freeze_supers(void)
> > +{
> > + struct super_block *sb, *p = NULL;
> > + int error = 0;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&sb_lock);
> > + /*
> > + * Freeze in reverse order so filesystems depending on others are
> > + * frozen in the right order (eg. loopback on ext3).
> > + */
> Ho, hum, are you sure the order in super_blocks list is the one you need?
> Maybe it is but I'm not sure you are guaranteed it is.

Well, is there any way I can get the right order?

> I've added Al to CC,
> he'll likely have opinion on this...
>
> > + list_for_each_entry_reverse(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) {
> > + if (list_empty(&sb->s_instances))
> > + continue;
> > + sb->s_count++;
> > + spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
> > +
> > + if (sb->s_root && sb->s_frozen != SB_FREEZE_TRANS
> > + && !(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
> > + error = freeze_super(sb);
> > + if (!error)
> > + sb->s_flags |= MS_FROZEN;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&sb_lock);
> > + if (error)
> > + break;
> > + if (p)
> > + __put_super(p);
> > + p = sb;
> > + }
> > + if (p)
> > + __put_super(p);
> > + spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
> > +
> > + if (error)
> > + thaw_supers();
> > +
> > + return error;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > +/**
> > * get_super - get the superblock of a device
> > * @bdev: device to get the superblock for
> > *

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/