Re: [PATCH V1] arm: tegra: dma: not required to move requestor whenstopping.

[Laxman Dewangan]

On Wednesday 25 January 2012 02:27 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Laxman Dewangan wrote at Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:11 AM:
> > It is not require to move the requestor of dma to INVALID
> > option before stopping dma.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I know that Laxman has checked with the HW engineers, and they see no
> reason to do this. I was originally worried about hung FIFOs preventing
> an in-progress DMA from completely without the removed code, but according
> to HW, that isn't a concern.
Olaf,
Can it be applied if it is OK to you?

Thanks,
Laxman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/