Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (trace/events/sunrpc.h)

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 03:14 +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:

> Hmm.... How about if we rather take that out of the RPC_DEBUG condition?
> I'm assuming that if someone compiles in the tracepoint code, then they
> want to be able to do a full trace independently of whether or not they
> set CONFIG_SYSCTL.

Works for me.

> 
> 8<---------------------------------------------------------------------
> From d051b60dcc3032b71cf8d9b96ac4bf24f12b6dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:01:15 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Ensure that we can trace waitqueues when
>  !defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL)
> 
> The tracepoint code relies on the queue->name being defined in order to
> be able to display the name of the waitqueue on which an RPC task is
> sleeping.
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

-- Steve

> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h |    3 +++
>  include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h |   15 +++++++++++++--
>  net/sunrpc/sched.c           |    4 +---
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/