Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Numeric assembly labels cause incorrectannotation

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 12:40 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: 
> > Em Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 02:55:35PM +1100, Anton Blanchard escreveu:
> > > 
> > > A perf annotate of a kernel function written in assembly shows
> > > very strange percentages:
> > 
> > Thanks! I think this is the same problem Mike Galbraith noticed and
> > reported me (I guess that was in a private message), Mike, can you
> > please test it so that I can add more Foo-by stamps to this one?
> 
> Sorry for the slow response (bz bz).
> 
> I don't see that problem, but perf top annotation isn't 
> working properly in tip at least.  It seems to have forgotten 
> how to average, seems to be clearing hit counts at every 
> screen refresh or something.

hm, seems to work fine here. We used to have such a bug recently 
(as of a few weeks [days?] ago), but latest -tip does not show 
those symptoms.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/