[PATCH 21/40] OpenRISC: Don't reimplement force_sigsegv()

[Matt Fleming]

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>

Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call
it. This also fixes a bug because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler
(which is a copy of sighand->action[]), whereas the intention of the
code was to modify sighand->action[] directly.

As the original code was working with a copy it had no effect on
signal delivery.

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c |    4 +---
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
index 95207ab..53741ba 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
@@ -250,9 +250,7 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
 	return;
 
 give_sigsegv:
-	if (sig == SIGSEGV)
-		ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
-	force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+	force_sigsegv(sig, current);
 }
 
 static inline void
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/