Re: [patch net-next] cxgb3: update firmware version

From: Rick Jones
Date: Tue Feb 14 2012 - 15:02:28 EST


On 02/14/2012 10:21 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:17:27AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
What does an end-user/customer see and do? When they are told that
version the firmware, specified down to the fix level, fixes a
problem they are having, how will they know that firmware blob
filename drvfw-X.bin on a download/archive site has that fix?
[...]

Customers currently can't get bug fixes by updating the firmware.
Think about it.

Because in this case at least the driver is requesting a specific filename down to the minor and micro level and a change in the filename requires a change in the driver?

#define FW_VERSION __stringify(FW_VERSION_MAJOR) "." \
__stringify(FW_VERSION_MINOR) "." __stringify(FW_VERSION_MICRO)
#define FW_FNAME "cxgb3/t3fw-" FW_VERSION ".bin"

rather than the driver having logic to make it willing to accept later minor/micro changes by being more sophisticated in its specification of firmware file.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/