RE: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: fix wrong header name in description

[Kim, Milo]

OK, thanks for your advice.
Then should I resend other two patches based on linux-next tree ?

Milo -

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:10 PM
> To: Kim, Milo
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: fix wrong header name in
> description
> 
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:41:32PM -0800, Kim, Milo wrote:
> > The 'mode' is defined in consumer.h.
> >
> > * patch base version : linux-3.2.4
> 
> Applied, thanks, but you should only include administrative stuff like
> the above after the ---.  You should also always submit patches against
> either Linus' tree (for fixes) or -next (for everything else) rather
> than an old kernel.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/