Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Fri Feb 17 2012 - 13:06:09 EST


> >
> > /*
> > * Please do not include this file in generic code. There is currently
> > * no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held
> > * within this file.
> > *
> > * Thanks. --rmk
> > */
> >
> > A quick grep indicates that we've lost this battle ;) Is the comments
> > still true? Should we stop discouraging inclusion of linux/irq.h?
> > Does anyone even know that it's discouraged ;)
>
> It's still true for any platform which hasn't been converted to genirq,
> as such a platform would not have asm/hw_irq.h.

In-tree only s390 is not using genirq.
All the rest are converted and provide hw_irq.h -
most of the new archs provide hw_irq via asm-generic so it does
not show up unless you look in the Kbuild file,.

Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/