Re: TCP_STREAM performance regression on commit b3613118

From: Alex,Shi
Date: Sun Feb 19 2012 - 20:46:48 EST


On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 13:33 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:50:39 +0100
>
> > Le vendredi 17 fÃvrier 2012 Ã 16:18 +0800, Alex,Shi a Ãcrit :
> >> The tcp_stream loop back performance has about 10% drop on the
> >> commitment on our core2 2 sockets server. This commit has 2
> >> parents(7505afe28, 5983fe), but both of them have no regression. So
> >> guess the impact just happened when this 2 parents joint. That beyond
> >> our capability to dig it more.
> >>
> >> Any ideas?
> >
> > Most probably the more accurate truesize determination is responsible of
> > this tcp regression, since some prior assumptions might be wrong.
> >
> > Want to give more information on the workload ?
> > Is it a 32 or 64 bit kernel ?

It is 64 bit kernel. Currently we only care 64bit.

Will try to bring more statistic after our lab recovered.
>
> And let's start CC:'ing netdev too.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/