Re: [PATCH] percpu: fix generic definition of__this_cpu_add_and_return()

[Tejun Heo]

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:53:08AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> 
> > This patch adds missed "__" into function prefix.
> > Otherwise on all archectures (except x86) it expands to irq/preemtion-safe
> > variant: _this_cpu_generic_add_return(), which do extra irq-save/irq-restore.
> > Optimal generic implementation is __this_cpu_generic_add_return().
> 
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied to 3.3-fixes.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/