Re: [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: i.MX DMA series.

[Vinod Koul]

On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:51 +0100, javier Martin wrote:
> On 10 February 2012 15:31, Javier Martin
> <javier.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Patches 1-3 have already been sent to the list (not merged yet)
> > but they are submitted so that everyone can get the whole picture
> > of what we're trying to do here.
> >
> > A new patch(4) has been added which adds support for multiple
> > descriptors.
> >
> > [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: Add support for MEMCPY for imx-dma.
> > [PATCH 2/4] i.MX DMA: Add support for 2D transfers.
> > [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: i.MX: Add support for interleaved transfers.
> > [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: Add support for multiple descriptors for imx-dma.
> 
> Hi,
> what do you think of this series?
> 
> Vinod: your concern about patch 1 is solved in patch 4
> Sascha: I know you are not comfortable with patch 2 since it adds code
> to a file which is meant to be removed. However, is there a chance you
> accept it without me having to rewrite the whole series?
Without 2, I think this patch set looks okay. Sascha have you tested
this series, if so please let me know, I can apply the rest.


-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/