Re: [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 02/23/2012 03:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 
> And a "clean" 3.2.7 doesn't have that problem?
> 
> Does the same thing happen in Linus's tree at the moment?
> 

Clean 3.2.7 I don't think has that problem, although of course when I
run the stress test it fails on other ways so it's hard to 100% rule out.

Linus' tree doesn't have that problems.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/